seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

However, In case the same person were charged with section 300 and 302, their defence that they never intended to get rid of the person – and that they just planned to injure them or incapacitate them –, will fail, since the elements of the offence only call for the intent to cause injury for being proven, not the intention to cause death.

116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as set forth would not use, since the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, fairly he has actually been acquitted of the criminal charges based on evidence and it really is effectively-settled legislation that once the civil servant is acquitted from the criminal case, then on this very charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment by the department and held him disqualified for the post because acquittal for all future purposes. The aforesaid proposition has been set at naught by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of the District Police Officer Mainwali and a pair of others v.

Deterrence: The anxiety of severe outcomes, which includes capital punishment, is meant to deter potential criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is essential in reducing the occurrence of intentional killings.

The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is a comprehensive piece of legislation that defines numerous criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for those found guilty.

This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court might interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to make it suitable into the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decision of the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment of your grid project and submitted that enough mitigation measures were in place to render any potential adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to generally be developed.

The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge mainly because it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders trying to keep in view that one of many respondents has retired from service as pointed out from the counsel with the respondent university. 12. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order as to costs. Read more

The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to make sure the Act's effective implementation in line with its initial purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor diploma(s) in the topic of cooperative societies. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners could seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Should the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only performed When the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded to the allegations therefore they were nicely mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

She did note that the boy still needed intensive therapy in order to manage with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being Risk-free with other children.” The boy was getting counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved on the actions.

The latest amendment to more info this section signifies the legislature’s dedication to boosting the effectiveness of your law in tackling contemporary challenges related to counterfeiting.

Pakistan’s legal system isn't without flaws: overhauling is overdue plus the legislation regarding murder necessitates really serious reconsideration and clarification. For your time being, the least that can be done is to ensure that the First Investigation Report (FIR) is registered with honesty and after properly ascertaining the facts.